4.7 Article

Novel Endosymbionts in Rhizarian Amoebae Imply Universal Infection of Unrelated Free-Living Amoebae by Legionellales

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.642216

关键词

Legionella; endosymbiotic bacteria; pneumonia; free-living amoebae; biofilms; Coxiellaceae; Cercozoa; gnotobiotic protist culture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Legionellales-infected water can cause outbreaks of Legionnaires' disease and Pontiac fever, and decontamination is difficult as Legionellales reproduce in eukaryotic microorganisms. Research suggests that Thecofilosea amoebae, particularly in soils and wastewater treatment plants, may serve as potential hosts for endosymbiotic Legionellales, including Legionella. The morphotype, rather than the evolutionary origin, of amoebae seems to determine their suitability as hosts for Legionellales, with a protocol provided for gnotobiotic cultivation of Legionellales and their hosts.
Legionellales-infected water is a frequent cause of local outbreaks of Legionnaires' disease and Pontiac fever. Decontaminations are difficult because Legionellales reproduce in eukaryotic microorganisms (protists). Most often, Legionellales have been isolated from amoebae; however, the culture-based sampling methods are taxonomically biased. Sequencing studies show that amoebae in the cercozoan class Thecofilosea are dominant in soils and wastewater treatment plants, prompting us to screen their capability to serve as potential hosts of endosymbiotic bacteria. Environmental isolates of Thecofilosea contained a surprising richness of endosymbiotic Legionellales, including Legionella. Considering the widespread dispersal of Legionellales in apparently unrelated amoeboid protist taxa, it appears that the morphotype and not the evolutionary origin of amoebae determines their suitability as hosts for Legionellales. We further provide a protocol for gnotobiotic cultivation of Legionellales and their respective hosts, facilitating future genomic and transcriptomic research of host-symbiont relationships.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据