4.8 Article

Robustness of the microtubule network self-organization in epithelia

期刊

ELIFE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.59529

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L016508/01]
  2. Royal Society of Edinburgh Royal Society of Edinburgh
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/P007503/1]
  4. Leverhulme Trust [RPG-2017-249]
  5. Scottish Funding Council
  6. Heriot-Watt University
  7. University of Edinburgh
  8. BBSRC [BB/P007503/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The robustness of microtubule networks plays a crucial role in ensuring the stable delivery of cellular components, depending on the separation of time-scales in microtubule dynamics rates. This robustness is demonstrated in both individual cells and tissue-scale through large-scale stochastic simulations and genetic manipulations of Drosophila epithelial cells.
Robustness of biological systems is crucial for their survival, however, for many systems its origin is an open question. Here, we analyze one subcellular level system, the microtubule cytoskeleton. Microtubules self-organize into a network, along which cellular components are delivered to their biologically relevant locations. While the dynamics of individual microtubules is sensitive to the organism's environment and genetics, a similar sensitivity of the overall network would result in pathologies. Our large-scale stochastic simulations show that the self-organization of microtubule networks is robust in a wide parameter range in individual cells. We confirm this robustness in vivo on the tissue-scale using genetic manipulations of Drosophila epithelial cells. Finally, our minimal mathematical model shows that the origin of robustness is the separation of time-scales in microtubule dynamics rates. Altogether, we demonstrate that the tissue-scale self-organization of a microtubule network depends only on cell geometry and the distribution of the microtubule minus-ends.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据