4.5 Article

An Assessment of ERA5 Reanalysis for Antarctic Near-Surface Air Temperature

期刊

ATMOSPHERE
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos12020217

关键词

ERA5; ERA-Interim; Antarctica; air temperature; in situ observations

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41671073, 41476164]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance of ERA5 in Antarctica shows strong linear relationship with observed data, effectively representing the temperature changes in the region. Despite some bias, ERA5 can play an important role as a useful tool to explore climate change in Antarctica.
The European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) released its latest reanalysis dataset named ERA5 in 2017. To assess the performance of ERA5 in Antarctica, we compare the near-surface temperature data from ERA5 and ERA-Interim with the measured data from 41 weather stations. ERA5 has a strong linear relationship with monthly observations, and the statistical significant correlation coefficients (p < 0.05) are higher than 0.95 at all stations selected. The performance of ERA5 shows regional differences, and the correlations are high in West Antarctica and low in East Antarctica. Compared with ERA5, ERA-Interim has a slightly higher linear relationship with observations in the Antarctic Peninsula. ERA5 agrees well with the temperature observations in austral spring, with significant correlation coefficients higher than 0.90 and bias lower than 0.70 degrees C. The temperature trend from ERA5 is consistent with that from observations, in which a cooling trend dominates East Antarctica and West Antarctica, while a warming trend exists in the Antarctic Peninsula except during austral summer. Generally, ERA5 can effectively represent the temperature changes in Antarctica and its three subregions. Although ERA5 has bias, ERA5 can play an important role as a powerful tool to explore the climate change in Antarctica with sparse in situ observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据