4.5 Article

Measuring Hydrogen in Indoor Air with a Selective Metal Oxide Semiconductor Sensor

期刊

ATMOSPHERE
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos12030366

关键词

hydrogen; indoor air; human presence; metal oxide semiconductor gas sensors; indoor air quality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen, often neglected in indoor air studies, can be effectively monitored using selective MOS sensors and analytical reference devices. The results demonstrate the importance of monitoring hydrogen in indoor air for quality control, although further attention is needed in this area.
Hydrogen is a ubiquitous but often neglected gas. In analytical measurements hydrogen-as a harmless gas-often is not considered so no studies on hydrogen in indoor air can be found. For metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) gas sensors that are increasingly pushed into the application as TVOC (total volatile organic compounds) sensors, hydrogen is a severe disturbance. On the other hand, hydrogen can be an intentional choice as indicator for human presence similar to carbon dioxide. We present a field-study on hydrogen in indoor air using selective MOS sensors accompanied by an analytical reference device for hydrogen with an accuracy of 10 ppb. Selectivity is achieved by siloxane treatment combined with temperature cycled operation and training with a complex lab calibration using randomized gas mixtures, yielding an uncertainty of 40-60 ppb. The feasibility is demonstrated by release tests with several gases inside a room and by comparison to the reference device. The results show that selective MOS sensors can function as cheap and available hydrogen detectors. Fluctuations in hydrogen concentration without human presence are measured over several days to gain insight in this highly relevant parameter for indoor air quality. The results indicate that the topic needs further attention and that the usage of hydrogen as indicator for human presence might be precluded by other sources and fluctuations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据