4.7 Article

Using surfactants for controlling rotifer contamination in mass cultivation of Chlorella pyrenoidosa

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.algal.2020.102166

关键词

Chlorella; Rotifer; Surfactant; Sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate; Microzooplanktonic contamination

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31702367]
  2. China Petrochemical Corporation [210080, 215104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate is effective in controlling rotifer contamination in Chlorella cultures without negative effects on algal growth. It is a fast-acting, highly effective, and low-cost treatment method for biological contamination control in microalgae mass culture.
Frequent microzooplankton contamination such as rotifers in Chlorella mass culture often causes devastating effects on biomass production. In this study, five surfactants were used to control contamination by a rotifer, Brachionus calyciflorus, in Chlorella pyrenoidosa XQ-20044 cultures. Laboratory results showed that the minimal effective concentrations of surfactants for complete control of B. calyciflorus were 7.5, 10, 10, 10, and 15 mg L-1 for primary alcohol ethoxylate, sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, sodium alcohol ether sulfate, coconut diethanolamide, and sodium dodecyl sulfate, respectively. However, only 10 mg L-1 sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate and 7.5-10 mg L-1 primary alcohol ethoxylate had no negative effects on algal growth. Moreover, in a 5 m(2) open raceway pond, 10 mg L-1 sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate ensured swift and total elimination of rotifers, while the final dry weight of the algae reached >0.74 g L-1 whereas the cost of using sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate was only $ 0.014. The results of this study indicated that sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate approach is fast-acting, highly effective, and a low-cost treatment. Therefore, sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate has great potential for biological contamination control in microalgae mass culture without a negative impact on algal growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据