4.6 Review

Recent Advances of Cocrystals with Room Temperature Phosphorescence

期刊

ADVANCED OPTICAL MATERIALS
卷 9, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adom.202002197

关键词

halogen bonding; hydrogen bonding; ionic bonding; organic cocrystals; room temperature phosphorescence; π – π stacking

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21975120, 91833304, 21875104, 21973043]
  2. Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Jiangsu Province [BK20180037]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [3102019IFE04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic phosphorescent materials have gained attention for their potential in various functional applications. By designing and modulating their weak spin-orbit coupling, highly active triplet excitons, and ultrafast deactivation, these materials can exhibit long-lived room temperature phosphorescence characteristics. Organic cocrystals formed through noncovalent interactions have diverse phosphorescent properties, sparking wide interest.
Organic phosphorescent materials have attracted wide attention in recent years owing to their opportunities in various functional applications. Through appropriate molecular design strategies and synthetic perspectives to modulate their weak spin-orbit coupling, highly active triplet excitons, and ultrafast deactivation, the organic phosphors can be endowed with long-lived room temperature phosphorescence (RTP) characteristics. Organic cocrystals constructed by noncovalent intermolecular interactions (hydrogen and halogen bonding, pi-pi stacking and so on) are provoking wide interest due to their unexpected and multifaceted phosphorescence properties and their applications. In this review, research on organic cocrystals with RTP based on their interactions is described, revealing their structure-property relationships. Furthermore, current accomplishments, restrictions, and viewpoints along with some guidance for their further study are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据