4.6 Article

Hydrothermal Leaching Behavior of Manganese from Waste Zn-Mn Dry Batteries

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 3137-3144

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c07888

关键词

hydrothermal leaching; waste batteries; manganese element; phosphoric acid; recycling

资金

  1. Science & Technology Innovation Action Plan of Shanghai under the Belt and Road Initiative [18230742800]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, phosphoric acid and hydrogen peroxide systems were used to recover manganese from the positive electrode material of zinc-manganese dry batteries. The optimized conditions for leaching reaction were found to be 225 degrees C temperature, 2.28 mol/L phosphoric acid concentration, 80.9 min reaction time, 30.4 g/L solid to liquid ratio, and 3 vol % hydrogen peroxide, resulting in an average leaching efficiency of 97.3% for manganese. The activation energy of the leaching reaction was determined to be 17.04 kJ/mol.
In this study, phosphoric acid and hydrogen peroxide systems were used to recover manganese from the positive electrode material of zinc-manganese dry batteries. Factors influencing leaching reaction were discussed. The results of response surface analysis showed that the degree of influence of each factor on the leaching reaction followed the trend reaction temperature > solid-liquid ratio > phosphoric acid concentration > reaction time > amount of hydrogen peroxide added. The best conditions for leaching reaction optimized through the curved surface method were as follows: 225 degrees C temperature, 2.28 mol/L phosphoric acid concentration, 80.9 min reaction time, 30.4 g/L solid to liquid ratio, and 3 vol % hydrogen peroxide. The average leaching efficiency of manganese under best condition was 97.3%, which was consistent with the theoretical value. This model can be used to predict the leaching efficiency of manganese. The apparent activation energy of the leaching reaction was 17.04 kJ/mol.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据