4.6 Article

Non-Ideality in Thymol plus Menthol Type V Deep Eutectic Solvents

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 2203-2211

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c07874

关键词

Alternative solvent; Characterization; Hydrogen-bonding; Temperature dependent; Nonionic eutectic solvent

资金

  1. Foundation for Science and Technology/MCTES [UIDB/50011/2020, UIDP/50011/2020]
  2. FEDER through COMPETE 2020 [022161]
  3. FEDER through POCI [022161]
  4. FEDER through PORL [022161]
  5. FCT through PIDDAC [022161]
  6. national funds (OE), through FCT-Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, I.P.
  7. University of Rome Sapienza [RG11715C7CC660BE]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that nonionic Type V deep eutectic solvents exhibit significant temperature-dependent nonideality due to changes in intermolecular hydrogen bonding with temperature.
The nonionic Type V deep eutectic solvent (DESs) thymol + menthol is experimentally and computationally studied aiming to clarify the relation between its liquid phase structure and its thermodynamic nonideality. H-1 NMR, Raman, and X-ray scattering analysis of the thymol + menthol system, supported by molecular dynamics simulations, show complex intermolecular interactions dominated by sterically hindered H-bonded clusters. For temperatures greater than or equal to room temperature, a quasi-linear evolution of the eutectic system properties between the pure compounds is observed, suggesting the absence of a magic stoichiometric composition in the eutectic solvent. However, temperature dependent Raman spectroscopy indicates a notable increase in thymol-menthol H-bonding as temperatures approach the eutectic point. This study shows that nonionic Type V DESs present an important temperature-dependent nonideality originating from the change in the intermolecular H-bonding with temperature. These findings have significant implications for the design and growing application of Type V DESs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据