4.6 Article

The Cross-Dike Failure Probability by Wave Overtopping over Grass-Covered and Damaged Dikes

期刊

WATER
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w13050690

关键词

wave overtopping; erosion; levee; cover; probabilistic framework

资金

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [P15-21]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A probabilistic framework is developed to calculate the cross-dike failure probability by overtopping waves on grass-covered dikes. The most likely location of failure is found to be the landward toe of the dike profile. The quality of the grass cover significantly affects the failure probability, with a potential impact up to a factor of 1000.
A probabilistic framework is developed to calculate the cross-dike failure probability by overtopping waves on grass-covered dikes. The cross-dike failure probability of dike profiles including transitions and damages can be computed to find the most likely location of failure and quantify the decrease in the failure probability when this location is strengthened. The erosion depth along the dike profile is calculated using probability distributions for the water level, wind speed and dike cover strength. Failure is defined as the exceedance of 20 cm erosion depth when the topsoil of the grass cover is eroded. The cross-dike failure probability shows that the landward toe is the most vulnerable location for wave overtopping. Herein, the quality of the grass cover significantly affects the failure probability up to a factor 1000. Next, the failure probability for different types of damages on the landward slope are calculated. In case of a damage where the grass cover is still intact and strong, the dike is most likely to fail at the landward toe due to high flow velocity and additional load due to the slope change. However, when the grass cover is also damaged, the probability of failure at the damage is between 4 and 125 times higher than for a regular dike profile.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据