4.7 Article

Effect of chemical stress and ultraviolet radiation in the bacterial communities of zebrafish embryos

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 208, 期 -, 页码 626-636

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.10.039

关键词

Danio rerio embryos; Microbiota; DGGE; Ultraviolet radiation; Chemical stress

资金

  1. European Funds through COMPETE
  2. Portuguese Science Foundation (FCT) [PTDC/AAG-GLO/4059/2012]
  3. FCT [SFRH/BPD/90521/2012]
  4. QREN
  5. Mais Centro - Programa Operacional Regional do Centro
  6. European Union/European Regional Development Fund
  7. Portuguese Science Foundation (FCT) through CESAM [CESAM/AMB/2013]
  8. [BPD/UI88/6463/2014]
  9. [CENTRO-07-ST24-FEDER-002033]
  10. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/AAG-GLO/4059/2012] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to assess the effect of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and chemical stress (triclosan-TCS; potassium dichromate-PD; prochloraz-PCZ) on bacterial communities of zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos (ZEBC). Embryos were exposed to two UVR intensities and two chemical concentrations not causing mortality or any developmental effect (equivalent to the No-Observed-Effect Concentration-NOEC; NOEC diluted by 10-NOEC/10). Effects on ZEBC were evaluated using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and interpreted considering structure, richness and diversity. ZEBC were affected by both stressors even at concentrations/doses not affecting the host-organism (survival/development). Yet, some stress-tolerant bacterial groups were revealed. The structure of the ZEBC was always affected, mainly due to xenobiotic presence. Richness and diversity decreased after exposure to NOEC of PD. Interactive effects occurred for TCS and UVR. Aquatic microbiota imbalance might have repercussions for the host/aquatic system, particularly in a realistic scenario/climate change perspective therefore, future ecotoxicological models should consider xenobiotics interactions with UVR. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据