4.7 Article

Development of multi-functional streetscape green infrastructure using a performance index approach

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 208, 期 -, 页码 209-220

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.09.003

关键词

Green infrastructure; Multi-functional; Pollution; Performance index; Streetscape

资金

  1. Marie Curie Fellowship within the 7th European Community Framework Programme (FP7) [275861]
  2. UK-EPSRC iBUILD: Infrastructure Business models, valuation and Innovation for Local Delivery [EP/K012398/1]
  3. EU-FP7 RAMSES: Reconciling Adaptation, Mitigation and Sustainable Development for Cities projects
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K012398/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/K012398/1, EP/N010612/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a performance evaluation framework for streetscape vegetation. A performance index (PI) is conceived using the following seven traits, specific to the street environments - Pollution Flux Potential (PFP), Carbon Sequestration Potential (CSP), Thermal Comfort Potential (TCP), Noise Attenuation Potential (NAP), Biomass Energy Potential (BEP), Environmental Stress Tolerance (EST) and Crown Projection Factor (CPF). Its application is demonstrated through a case study using fifteen street vegetation species from the UK, utilising a combination of direct field measurements and inventoried literature data. Our results indicate greater preference to small-to-medium size trees and evergreen shrubs over larger trees for streetscaping. The proposed PI approach can be potentially applied two-fold: one, for evaluation of the performance of the existing street vegetation, facilitating the prospects for further improving them through management strategies and better species selection; two, for planning new streetscapes and multi-functional biomass as part of extending the green urban infrastructure. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据