4.7 Article

High Accuracy Interpolation of DEM Using Generative Adversarial Network

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13040676

关键词

DEM interpolation; generative adversarial network; gated convolution; dilated convolution structure

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Project [2020YFD1100203]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a GAN-based network named GSUGAN is proposed for improved DEM interpolation, outperforming traditional methods and CEDGAN both visually and quantitatively. The results show that gated convolution and symmetric dilated convolution structures perform slightly better, and GAN-based methods excel in visual quality, especially in complex terrains, compared to CNN-based methods.
Digital elevation model (DEM) interpolation is aimed at predicting the elevation values of unobserved locations, given a series of collected points. Over the years, the traditional interpolation methods have been widely used but can easily lead to accuracy degradation. In recent years, generative adversarial networks (GANs) have been proven to be more efficient than the traditional methods. However, the interpolation accuracy is not guaranteed. In this paper, we propose a GAN-based network named gated and symmetric-dilated U-net GAN (GSUGAN) for improved DEM interpolation, which performs visibly and quantitatively better than the traditional methods and the conditional encoder-decoder GAN (CEDGAN). We also discuss combinations of new techniques in the generator. This shows that the gated convolution and symmetric dilated convolution structure perform slightly better. Furthermore, based on the performance of the different methods, it was concluded that the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based method has an advantage in the quantitative accuracy but the GAN-based method can obtain a better visual quality, especially in complex terrains. In summary, in this paper, we propose a GAN-based network for improved DEM interpolation and we further illustrate the GAN-based method's performance compared to that of the CNN-based method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据