4.7 Article

A New Integrated Approach for Municipal Landfill Siting Based on Urban Physical Growth Prediction: A Case Study Mashhad Metropolis in Iran

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13050949

关键词

landfill; urban growth; ecological degradation; waste management; remote sensing; urban planning

资金

  1. Agrohydrology Research Group of Tarbiat Modares University [IG-39713]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes an integrated approach for determining suitable landfill locations using FAHP and WLC, while predicting urban growth using SVM and cellular automation-based Markov chain method. The case study in Mashhad, Iran, demonstrates the applicability of the approach in identifying suitable landfill sites and reducing uncertainty in long-term resource allocation.
Due to irregular and uncontrolled expansion of cities in developing countries, currently operational landfill sites cannot be used in the long-term, as people will be living in proximity to these sites and be exposed to unhygienic circumstances. Hence, this study aims at proposing an integrated approach for determining suitable locations for landfills while considering their physical expansion. The proposed approach utilizes the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) to weigh the sets of identified landfill location criteria. Furthermore, the weighted linear combination (WLC) approach was applied for the elicitation of the proper primary locations. Finally, the support vector machine (SVM) and cellular automation-based Markov chain method were used to predict urban growth. To demonstrate the applicability of the developed approach, it was applied to a case study, namely the city of Mashhad in Iran, where suitable sites for landfills were identified considering the urban growth in different geographical directions for this city by 2048. The proposed approach could be of use for policymakers, urban planners, and other decision-makers to minimize uncertainty arising from long-term resource allocation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据