4.1 Article

Analysis and influence of the underwater phase of breaststroke on short-course 50 and 100m performance

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2021.1885838

关键词

Race analysis; Tactical and Strategy; Sport Performance; Swimming

资金

  1. Ministry of Innovation and Universities (Spanish Agency of Research)
  2. European Regional Development Funds (ERDF) [PGC2018-102116, B-100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the performance in breaststroke events of 50m and 100m is significantly influenced by start and turn velocities. The underwater swimming distance, time, and velocity play a key role in competition performance.
The aim was to analyse the influence of the breaststroke underwater phase on 50 and 100 m performance. A total of 108 performances in 50 m (61 males and 47 females), and 126 performances in 100 m (71 males and 55 females) were recorded during the 2019 Short-course National Spanish Championship. The underwater swimming time, distance and velocity were analysed after the start and turns. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and regression analysis were applied to compute the relation between the variables. The relative contribution (%) to final time and the differences between events and gender were studied through independent samples t-test (p < 0.05). High correlations were obtained for both events and genders between start time and final time (r = 0.76-0.91). The emersion velocity was higher in 50 m than in 100 m (p 1.0) and in males (50 m: 2.18 +/- 0.10 m center dot s(-1); 100 m: 1.87 +/- 0.08 m center dot s(-1)) than in females (50 m: 1.92 +/- 0.09 m center dot s(-1): 100 m: 1.71 +/- 0.08 m center dot s(-1)). Performance in both events was influenced significantly by turn velocity (r >= -0.85), and combined with the start, contributed to around 55% of the final time. Coaches should optimise the underwater phases of start and turns on breaststroke performance in short-course.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据