4.3 Article

Physical Activity during the First COVID-19-Related Lockdown in Italy

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052511

关键词

walking; cycling; leisure time activity; corona; confinement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spread of COVID-19 led to strict lockdown measures in many countries, including Italy. This study found a significant decline in physical activity during lockdown, with reduced walking and cycling time, decreased leisure time, and lower compliance with WHO recommendations.
The spread of the COVID-19 virus was met by a strict lockdown in many countries around the world, with the closure of all physical activity (PA) facilities and limitations on moving around freely. The aim of the present online survey was to assess the effect of lockdown on physical activity in Italy. Physical activity was assessed using the European Health Interview Survey questionnaire. A total of 1500 datasets were analyzed. Differences between conditions were tested with a chi(2)-based (chi(2)) test for categorical variables, and with the Student's t-test for paired data. A fixed effects binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify relevant predictor variables to explain the compliance with World Health Organisation (WHO) recommendations. We found a substantial decline in all physical activity measures. Mean differences in walking and cycling metabolic equivalent of task minutes per week (METmin/week), respectively, were 344.4 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 306.6-382.2; p < 0.001) and 148.5 (95% CI: 123.6-173.5; p < 0.001). Time spent in leisure time decreased from 160.8 to 112.6 min/week (mean difference 48.2; 95% CI: 40.4-56.0; p < 0.001). Compliance with WHO recommendations decreased from 34.9% to 24.6% (chi(2) (1, 3000) = 38.306, p < 0.001, V = 0.11). Logistic regression showed a reduced chance (OR 0.640, 95% CI: 0.484-0.845; p = 0.001) to comply with WHO PA recommendations under lockdown conditions. Measures to promote physical activity should be intensified to limit detrimental health effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据