4.3 Article

Mining Complex Genetic Patterns Conferring Multiple Sclerosis Risk

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052518

关键词

genetic interactions; multiple sclerosis; association rule mining; epistasis

资金

  1. University Scholarship at Case Western Reserve University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study applied association rule mining to genetic data of non-Latinx MS cases and controls, revealing specific combinations of MS risk variants disproportionately confer elevated risk. By applying a robust analytical framework, the study demonstrated evidence of higher order genetic relationships in MS.
(1) Background: Complex genetic relationships, including gene-gene (G x G; epistasis), gene(n), and gene-environment (G x E) interactions, explain a substantial portion of the heritability in multiple sclerosis (MS). Machine learning and data mining methods are promising approaches for uncovering higher order genetic relationships, but their use in MS have been limited. (2) Methods: Association rule mining (ARM), a combinatorial rule-based machine learning algorithm, was applied to genetic data for non-Latinx MS cases (n = 207) and controls (n = 179). The objective was to identify patterns (rules) amongst the known MS risk variants, including HLA-DRB1*15:01 presence, HLA-A*02:01 absence, and 194 of the 200 common autosomal variants. Probabilistic measures (confidence and support) were used to mine rules. (3) Results: 114 rules met minimum requirements of 80% confidence and 5% support. The top ranking rule by confidence consisted of HLA-DRB1*15:01, SLC30A7-rs56678847 and AC093277.1-rs6880809; carriers of these variants had a significantly greater risk for MS (odds ratio = 20.2, 95% CI: 8.5, 37.5; p = 4 x 10(-9)). Several variants were shared across rules, the most common was INTS8-rs78727559, which was in 32.5% of rules. (4) Conclusions: In summary, we demonstrate evidence that specific combinations of MS risk variants disproportionately confer elevated risk by applying a robust analytical framework to a modestly sized study population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据