4.5 Article

A study on willingness and influencing factors to receive COVID-19 vaccination among Qingdao residents

期刊

HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 408-413

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1817712

关键词

COVID-19 vaccine; willingness; influencing factors; free vaccination

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that factors such as high income, attention to vaccine news, anticipation of successful vaccine research, and focus on vaccine protective efficacy influence residents' willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccination. In addition, those who pay attention to vaccine protective efficacy, vaccine price, and expert opinions are more likely to accept vaccination, while those concerned about vaccine safety are less inclined to do so.
This study investigated the willingness of Qingdao residents to receive COVID-19 vaccination in 2020 and any factors that might influence them. All data were collected by telephone questionnaires and were utilized for analyzing the potential factors of willingness to be vaccinated through descriptive analysis and logistic regression analysis. Of the 2,802 respondents, 2,284 (81.5%) said they would agree to receive the vaccine against COVID-19. People who earned high incomes, who carefully followed media news on COVID-19 vaccine, who looked forward to successful vaccine research, and who closely followed vaccine protective efficacy expressed more interest in being vaccinated than other people did. In addition, people who paid attention to protective efficacy of vaccine, vaccine price, and expert opinion were more likely to accept COVID-19 vaccination than people who focused on vaccine safety. When vaccine price was >= 201 RMB, people were less likely to accept vaccination than <= 200 RMB. 1,842 respondents (65.7%) wished that government could provide COVID-19 vaccination for free. This study suggests that the government should increase vaccination compliance by strengthening publicity efforts and decreasing vaccine price.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据