4.7 Article

A platform for crowdsourcing the creation of representative, accurate landcover maps

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
卷 80, 期 -, 页码 41-53

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.01.011

关键词

Remote sensing; Landcover; Crowd-sourcing; Accuracy assessment; Representative sampling; Object extraction

资金

  1. Princeton Environmental Institute Grand Challenges program
  2. NASA New Investigator Program [NNX15AC64G]
  3. National Science Foundation [SES-1360463, BCS-1026776]
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  5. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences [1360421] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  7. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences [1534544, 1360463, 1830752] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. NASA [809418, NNX15AC64G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate landcover maps are fundamental to understanding socio-economic and environmental patterns and processes, but existing datasets contain substantial errors. Crowdsourcing map creation may substantially improve accuracy, particularly for discrete cover types, but the quality and representativeness of crowdsourced data is hard to verify. We present an open-sourced platform, DIYlandcover, that serves representative samples of high resolution imagery to an online job market, where workers delineate individual landcover features of interest. Worker mapping skill is frequently assessed, providing estimates of overall map accuracy and a basis for performance-based payments. A trial of DIYlandcover showed that novice workers delineated South African cropland with 91% accuracy, exceeding the accuracy of current generation global landcover products, while capturing important geometric data. A scaling-up assessment suggests the possibility of developing an Africa-wide vector-based dataset of croplands for $2-3 million within 1.2-3.8 years. DIYlandcover can be readily adapted to map other discrete cover types. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据