4.7 Article

Using linkage logic theory to control dynamics of a gene regulatory network of a chordate embryo

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83045-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. CREST program of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) [JPMJCR13W6]
  2. Joint Usage/Research Center program of Institute for Frontier Life and Medical Sciences Kyoto University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Linkage logic theory provides a mathematical criterion for controlling network dynamics by manipulating a subset of network nodes. By using this theory, missing edges in experimental networks can be found, the information content of reconstituted networks can be evaluated, and cell fate can be reprogrammed accordingly.
Linkage logic theory provides a mathematical criterion to control network dynamics by manipulating activities of a subset of network nodes, which are collectively called a feedback vertex set (FVS). Because many biological functions emerge from dynamics of biological networks, this theory provides a promising tool for controlling biological functions. By manipulating the activity of FVS molecules identified in a gene regulatory network (GRN) for fate specification of seven tissues in ascidian embryos, we previously succeeded in reproducing six of the seven cell types. Simultaneously, we discovered that the experimentally reconstituted GRN lacked information sufficient to reproduce muscle cells. Here, we utilized linkage logic theory as a tool to find missing edges in the GRN. Then, we identified a FVS from an updated version of the GRN and confirmed that manipulating the activity of this FVS was sufficient to induce all seven cell types, even in a multi-cellular environment. Thus, linkage logic theory provides tools to find missing edges in experimentally reconstituted networks, to determine whether reconstituted networks contain sufficient information to fulfil expected functions, and to reprogram cell fate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据