4.7 Article

Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82300-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST103-2320-B038-005-MY3]
  2. Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University [105swf08]
  3. China Medical University Hospital [CMUH-DMR-108-056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the impact of AIF selection on vertebral perfusion quantification using DCE-MRI. Simulation results showed that decreasing peak in AIF increased K-trans and v(e), while increasing delay time in AIF increased v(p). In human subjects, K-trans and v(e) were significantly smaller with AIF_A compared to AIF_SA, while both parameters were significantly greater with AIF_SA compared to AIF_A.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of arterial input function (AIF) selection on the quantification of vertebral perfusion using axial dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). In this study, axial DCE-MRI was performed on 2 vertebrae in each of eight healthy volunteers (mean age, 36.9 years; 5 men) using a 1.5-T scanner. The pharmacokinetic parameters K-trans, v(e), and v(p), derived using a Tofts model on axial DCE-MRI of the lumbar vertebrae, were evaluated using various AIFs: the population-based aortic AIF (AIF_PA), a patient-specific aortic AIF (AIF_A) and a patient-specific segmental arterial AIF (AIF_SA). Additionally, peaks and delay times were changed to simulate the effects of various AIFs on the calculation of perfusion parameters. Nonparametric analyses including the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the Kruskal-Wallis test with a Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc analysis were performed. In simulation, K-trans and v(e) increased as the peak in the AIF decreased, but v(p) increased when delay time in the AIF increased. In humans, the estimated K-trans and v(e) were significantly smaller using AIF_A compared to AIF_SA no matter the computation style (pixel-wise or region-of-interest based). Both these perfusion parameters were significantly greater using AIF_SA compared to AIF_A.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据