4.7 Article

Overlooked potential of positrons in cancer therapy

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81910-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sydney Vital Translational Cancer Research Centre-Cancer Institute NSW, Sydney, Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed cytotoxicity of beta(+) emitters on prostate cancer cells and Monte Carlo simulation revealed thermalized positrons can damage DNA, indicating a potential therapeutic role for beta(+) emitters.
Positron (beta(+)) emitting radionuclides have been used for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in diagnostic medicine since its development in the 1950s. Development of a fluorinated glucose analog, fluorodeoxyglucose, labelled with a beta(+) emitter fluorine-18 (F-18-FDG), made it possible to image cellular targets with high glycolytic metabolism. These targets include cancer cells based on increased aerobic metabolism due to the Warburg effect, and thus, F-18-FDG is a staple in nuclear medicine clinics globally. However, due to its attention in the diagnostic setting, the therapeutic potential of beta(+) emitters have been overlooked in cancer medicine. Here we show the first in vitro evidence of beta(+) emitter cytotoxicity on prostate cancer cell line LNCaP C4-2B when treated with 20 Gy of F-18. Monte Carlo simulation revealed thermalized positrons (sub-keV) traversing DNA can be lethal due to highly localized energy deposition during the thermalization and annihilation processes. The computed single and double strand breakages were similar to 55% and 117% respectively, when compared to electrons at 400 eV. Our in vitro and in silico data imply an unexplored therapeutic potential for beta(+) emitters. These results may also have implications for emerging cancer theranostic strategies, where beta(+) emitting radionuclides could be utilized as a therapeutic as well as a diagnostic agent once the challenges in radiation safety and protection after patient administration of a radioactive compound are overcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据