4.7 Article

Phase I dose escalation study of sorafenib plus S-1 for advanced solid tumors

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84279-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. Taiwan Cooperative Oncology Group
  2. Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd
  3. TTY Biopharm Co., Ltd.
  4. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study determined the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of S-1 when combined with sorafenib for refractory solid tumors to be 30 mg/m(2) bid. Some patients achieved durable partial response or stable disease with this regimen. Further phase II studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of this combination in advanced pNET and colon cancer.
S-1, an oral pyrimidine fluoride-derived agent, is effective against various cancers. Sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, was found to prolong the survival of various cancers and enhance the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents. We conducted a phase I dose escalation study to determine dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of S-1 when combined with sorafenib for refractory solid tumors. Eligible patients received escalating doses (30, 35, and 40 mg/m(2) bid) of S-1 Day 1 (D1)-D14 and continuous sorafenib 400 mg bid from cycle 1 D8 every 21 days in a standard 3+3 study design. Primary endpoint was MTD. Thirteen patients were enrolled between May 2010 and Feb 2012. DLT developed in two (one grade 3 erythema and one prolonged grade 2 hand-foot-skin reaction) of the 6 patients at 35 mg/m(2) dose level. One pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET) patient achieved a durable partial response (27.9 months). Four colon cancer patients had stable disease and 3 of them had progression-free survival greater than 6 months. This study determined the recommended (MTD) S-1 dose of 30 mg/m(2) bid for this regimen. This result warrants further phase II studies for advanced pNET and colon cancer to evaluate the efficacy of this combination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据