4.6 Article

Processability and Mechanical Properties of Thermoplastic Polylactide/Polyhydroxybutyrate (PLA/PHB) Bioblends

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14040898

关键词

polylactide; polyhydroxybutyrate; blend; bioplastic

资金

  1. National Centre for Research and Development (NCBR) [LIDER/32/0139/L-7/15/NCBR/2016.g.]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focused on analyzing the processing properties of PLA/PHB blends without harmful additives, aiming to find the best ratio for materials suitable for the packaging industry. The 50/10 PLA/PHB blend was determined to offer the most desirable mechanical and processing properties, potentially becoming a bio-based and biodegradable material safe for human health.
This work considers the application of eco-friendly, biodegradable materials based on polylactide (PLA) and polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), instead of conventional polymeric materials, in order to prevent further environmental endangerment by accumulation of synthetic petro-materials. This new approach to the topic is focused on analyzing the processing properties of blends without incorporating any additives that could have a harmful impact on human organisms, including the endocrine system. The main aim of the research was to find the best PLA/PHB ratio to obtain materials with desirable mechanical, processing and application properties. Therefore, two-component polymer blends were prepared by mixing different mass ratios of PLA and PHB (100/0, 50/10, 50/20, 40/30, 50/50, 30/40, 20/50, 10/50 and 0/100 mass ratio) using an extrusion process. The prepared blends were analyzed in terms of thermal and mechanical properties as well as miscibility and surface characteristics. Taking into account the test results, the PLA/PHB blend with a 50/10 ratio turned out to be most suitable in terms of mechanical and processing properties. This blend has the potential to become a bio-based and simultaneously biodegradable material safe for human health dedicated for the packaging industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据