4.6 Article

Improved Electrical Characteristics of Gallium Oxide/P-Epi Silicon Carbide Static Induction Transistors with UV/Ozone Treatment Fabricated by RF Sputter

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14051296

关键词

gallium oxide; silicon carbide; static induction transistor; UV; ozone treatment

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning [20194010000050]
  2. Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea)
  3. Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) - Korea Government (MOTIE) [P0012451]
  4. Kwangwoon University
  5. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20194010000050] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, static induction transistors (SITs) with beta gallium oxide (beta-Ga2O3) channels were grown on a p-epi silicon carbide (SiC) layer via radio frequency sputtering. The Ga2O3 films were treated with UV/ozone, producing reduced oxygen vacancies, lower surface roughness and resistivity, and higher mobility. The UV/O-3-treated SITs exhibited significantly higher drain current and on/off ratio compared to non-treated control devices.
In this study, static induction transistors (SITs) with beta gallium oxide (beta-Ga2O3) channels are grown on a p-epi silicon carbide (SiC) layer via radio frequency sputtering. The Ga2O3 films are subjected to UV/ozone treatment, which results in reduced oxygen vacancies in the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy data, lower surface roughness (3.51 nm) and resistivity (319 omega center dot cm), and higher mobility (4.01 cm(2)V(-1)s(-1)). The gate leakage current is as low as 1.0 x 10(-11) A at V-GS = 10 V by the depletion layer formed between n-Ga2O3 and p-epi SiC at the gate region with a PN heterojunction. The UV/O-3-treated SITs exhibit higher (approximately 1.64 x 10(2) times) drain current (V-DS = 12 V) and on/off ratio (4.32 x 10(5)) than non-treated control devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据