4.6 Article

Effect of Solution Annealing on Fatigue Crack Propagation in the AISI 304L TRIP Steel

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14061331

关键词

solution annealing; fatigue crack propagation; martensitic transformation; crack closure; 304L steel; effective threshold; load shedding

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation [19-25591Y]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focused on fatigue crack propagation in near-threshold regime of 304L austenitic stainless steel in two microstructural states. It was found that the threshold for crack propagation was higher in the solution-annealed state by 1 MPa·m(0.5) compared to the as-received state, attributed to crack tip shielding induced by phase transformation.
Fatigue crack propagation in near-threshold regime was studied in the 304L austenitic stainless steel in two microstructural states: as-received (AR) with finer microstructure and low susceptibility to the transformation-induced plasticity (TRIP) effect, and solution-annealed (SA) with coarser microstructure and higher susceptibility to TRIP. At the load ratio R = 0.1 the threshold was higher in the SA state than in the AR state due to coarser grains and possibly the TRIP effect. In order to clarify the role of crack closure, experiments at R = 0.7 were done. The threshold in the SA state was still higher by 1 MPa center dot m(0.5). This effect was identified as crack tip shielding induced by phase transformation, an example of a non-closure shielding effect. Higher resistance to crack growth in the SA state was attributed to promoted martensitic transformation in non-favorable oriented grain families rather than thicker martensite layers in the crack path area. The conclusions were verified by experiments at R = 0.7 and temperature 150 degrees C > M-s which did not reveal any notable difference in thresholds. However, the threshold values were affected by the load-shedding gradient C = -d Delta K/da, which had to be equalized in both experimental setups inside and outside the furnace.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据