4.3 Review

Interventions for children and adolescents who stutter: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and evidence map

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS
卷 70, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2021.105843

关键词

Stuttering; Child; Adolescent; Therapeutics; Systematic review

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre of Research Excellence grant in Speech and Language Neurobiology
  2. NHMRC [1127144]
  3. NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship [1105008]
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1127144] Funding Source: NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic review examines the evidence for stuttering interventions in childhood and adolescence, finding that the Lidcombe Program and Demands and Capacities Model are effective in reducing stuttering in preschool aged children. However, there is currently no high-level evidence supporting interventions with school aged children or adolescents. Various treatment delivery methods were found to be as effective as individual face-to-face intervention.
Purpose: This systematic review critically appraises and maps the evidence for stuttering interventions in childhood and adolescence. We examine the effectiveness of speech-focused treatments, the efficacy of alternative treatment delivery methods and identify gaps in the research evidence. Methods: Nine electronic databases and three clinical trial registries were searched for systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and studies that applied an intervention with children (2-18 years) who stutter. Pharmacological interventions were excluded. Primary outcomes were a measure of stuttering severity and quality assessments were conducted on all included studies. Results: Eight RCTs met inclusion criteria and were analysed. Intervention approaches included direct (i.e. Lidcombe Program; LP) and indirect treatments (e.g. Demands and Capacities Model; DCM). All studies had moderate risk of bias. Treatment delivery methods included individual face-to-face, telehealth and group-based therapy. Both LP and DCM approaches were effective in reducing stuttering in preschool aged children. LP had the highest level of evidence (pooled effect size=-3.8, CI -7.3 to -0.3 for LP). There was no high-level evidence for interventions with school aged children or adolescents. Alternative methods of delivery were as effective as individual face-to-face intervention. Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review and evidence mapping are useful for clinicians, researchers and service providers seeking to understand the existing research to support the advancement of interventions for children and adolescence who stutter. Findings could be used to inform further research and support clinical decision-making.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据