4.7 Review

Diffuse Glioma Heterogeneity and Its Therapeutic Implications

期刊

CANCER DISCOVERY
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 575-590

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1474

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIH Director's Pioneer Award [DP1-CA228040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diffuse gliomas are characterized by high levels of genetic, epigenetic, and environmental heterogeneity, leading to extreme phenotypic heterogeneity at the cellular level and resistance to various therapies. The intratumoral heterogeneity and malignant cell state plasticity in gliomas pose significant challenges to the development of novel targeted therapies.
Diffuse gliomas represent a heterogeneous group of universally lethal brain tumors characterized by minimally effective genotype-targeted therapies. Recent advances have revealed that a remarkable level of genetic, epigenetic, and environmental heterogeneity exists within each individual glioma. Together, these interconnected layers of intratumoral heterogeneity result in extreme phenotypic heterogeneity at the cellular level, providing for multiple mechanisms of therapeutic resistance and forming a highly adaptable and resilient disease. In this review, we discuss how glioma intratumoral heterogeneity and malignant cellular state plasticity drive resistance to existing therapies and look to a future in which these challenges may be overcome. Significance: Glioma intratumoral heterogeneity and malignant cell state plasticity represent formidable hurdles to the development of novel targeted therapies. However, the convergence of genotypically diverse glioma cells into a limited set of epigenetically encoded transcriptional cell states may present an opportunity for a novel therapeutic strategy we call State Selective Lethality! In this approach, cellular states (as opposed to genetic perturbations/mutations) are the subject of therapeutic targeting, and plasticity-mediated resistance is minimized through the design of cell state trapping agents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据