4.5 Article

Which growth standards should be used to identify large- and small-for-gestational age infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes? A pre-specified analysis of the CONCEPTT trial

期刊

BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03554-6

关键词

Large-for-gestational-age; Small for gestational age; Macrosomia; Birth-weight; Diabetes; Pregnancy; CONCEPTT; Growth standards; INTERGROWTH; GROW

资金

  1. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF) [17-2011-533]
  2. JDRF [80-2010-585]
  3. FedDev Ontario
  4. National Institute for Health Research [CDF-2013-06-035]
  5. Tommy's charity
  6. Diabetes UK Harry Keen Intermediate Clinical Fellowship [DUK-HKF 17/0005712]
  7. EFSDNovo Nordisk Foundation Future Leader's Award [NNF19SA058974]
  8. JDRF Canadian Clinical Trial Network

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared rates of large- and small-for-gestational age newborns defined by different criteria and their association with perinatal complications. The results showed that GROW and INTERGROWTH standards performed similarly in identifying neonates with LGA and SGA, with GROW-defined LGA and INTERGROWTH-defined SGA having slightly stronger associations with neonatal complications. WHO standards may underestimate size in preterm infants and are less applicable for use in type 1 diabetes.
Background: Offspring of women with type 1 diabetes are at increased risk of fetal growth patterns which are associated with perinatal morbidity. Our aim was to compare rates of large- and small-for-gestational age (LGA; SGA) defined according to different criteria, using data from the Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Type 1 Diabetes Pregnancy Trial (CONCEPTT). Methods: This was a pre-specified analysis of CONCEPTT involving 225 pregnant women and liveborn infants from 31 international centres ( NCT01788527; registered 11/2/2013). Infants were weighed immediately at birth and GROW, INTERGROWTH and WHO centiles were calculated. Relative risk ratios, sensitivity and specificity were used to assess the different growth standards with respect to perinatal outcomes, including neonatal hypoglycaemia, hyperbilirubinaemia, respiratory distress, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and a composite neonatal outcome. Results: Accelerated fetal growth was common, with mean birthweight percentiles of 82.1, 85.7 and 63.9 and LGA rates of 62, 67 and 30% using GROW, INTERGROWTH and WHO standards respectively. Corresponding rates of SGA were 2.2, 1.3 and 8.9% respectively. LGA defined according to GROW centiles showed stronger associations with preterm delivery, neonatal hypoglycaemia, hyperbilirubinaemia and NICU admission. Infants born > 97.7th centile were at highest risk of complications. SGA defined according to INTERGROWTH centiles showed slightly stronger associations with perinatal outcomes. Conclusions: GROW and INTERGROWTH standards performed similarly and identified similar numbers of neonates with LGA and SGA. GROW-defined LGA and INTERGROWTH-defined SGA had slightly stronger associations with neonatal complications. WHO standards underestimated size in preterm infants and are less applicable for use in type 1 diabetes. Trial registration: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. number NCT01788527. Trial registered 11/2/2013.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据