4.8 Article

Borane-Catalyzed C(sp3)-F Bond Arylation and Esterification Enabled by Transborylation

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 3190-3197

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.1c00282

关键词

boron; arylation; esterification; bond-metathesis; C-F activation; ligand exchange; main group; transborylation

资金

  1. Royal Society [RGF/EA/180218, URF/R/191015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a borane-catalyzed coupling method for alkyl fluorides with arenes and carboxylic acids, achieving C-C and C-O bond formation with H-B-9-BBN and HBpin as catalysts, demonstrating broad functional group tolerance. Experimental and computational studies reveal a mechanistic dichotomy between the carbon-carbon and carbon-oxygen coupling reactions.
The activation and functionalization of carbon-fluorine bonds represent a significant synthetic challenge, given the high thermodynamic barrier to C-F bond cleavage. Stoichiometric hydrid oborane-mediated C-F functionalization has recently emerged, but is yet to be rendered catalytic. Herein, the borane-catalyzed coupling of alkyl fluorides with arenes (carbon-carbon bond formation) and carboxylic acids (carbon-oxygen bond formation) has been developed using transborylation reactions to achieve catalytic turnover. Successful C-C and C-O coupling across a variety of structurally and electronically differentiated arenes and carboxylic acids was achieved using 9-borabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane (H-B-9-BBN) as the catalyst and pinacol-borane (HBpin), with broad functional group tolerance. Experimental and computational studies suggest a mechanistic dichotomy for the carbon-carbon and carbon-oxygen coupling reactions. B-F transborylation (B-F/ B-H metathesis) between F-B-9-BBN and HBpin enabled catalytic turnover for carbon-carbon bond formation, whereas direct exchange between the alkyl fluoride and acyloxyboronic ester (C-F/B-O metathesis) was proposed for carbon-oxygen coupling, where H-B-9-BBN catalyzed the dehydrocoupling of the carboxylic acid with HBpin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据