4.8 Article

L1 retrotransposons exploit RNA m6A modification as an evolutionary driving force

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21197-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fellowship for Fundamental Academic Fields of SNU [IBS-R008-D1, NRF-2020R1A5A1018081, NRF2020R1A2C3011298]
  2. BK21 plus fellowship
  3. Ministry of Science & ICT (MSIT), Republic of Korea [IBS-R008-D1-2021-A00] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that m(6)A modifications on L1 RNA enhance translation efficiency and retrotransposition in human cells. M(6)A motifs are more enriched in evolutionary young L1s.
L1 retrotransposons can pose a threat to genome integrity. The host has evolved to restrict L1 replication. However, mechanisms underlying L1 propagation out of the host surveillance remains unclear. Here, we propose an evolutionary survival strategy of L1, which exploits RNA m(6)A modification. We discover that m(6)A 'writer' METTL3 facilitates L1 retrotransposition, whereas m(6)A 'eraser' ALKBH5 suppresses it. The essential m(6)A cluster that is located on L1 5 UTR serves as a docking site for eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3), enhances translational efficiency and promotes the formation of L1 ribonucleoprotein. Furthermore, through the comparative analysis of human- and primate-specific L1 lineages, we find that the most functional m(6)A motif-containing L1s have been positively selected and became a distinctive feature of evolutionarily young L1s. Thus, our findings demonstrate that L1 retrotransposons hijack the RNA m(6)A modification system for their successful replication. L1 is a group of active retrotransposons in humans. Here the authors show that m(6)A modifications on L1 RNA increase translation efficiency and retrotransposition in human cells. M(6)A motifs are more enriched in evolutionary young L1s.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据