4.8 Article

Cryo-EM reveals structural breaks in a patient-derived amyloid fibril from systemic AL amyloidosis

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21126-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Systemic AL amyloidosis is a debilitating disease caused by the misfolding and fibrillation of immunoglobulin light chains (LCs). This study presents two ex vivo fibril structures of a lambda 3 LC derived from patient tissue, revealing the co-existence of two different fibril structures at different z-axial positions within the same fibril.
Systemic AL amyloidosis is a debilitating and potentially fatal disease that arises from the misfolding and fibrillation of immunoglobulin light chains (LCs). The disease is patient-specific with essentially each patient possessing a unique LC sequence. In this study, we present two ex vivo fibril structures of a lambda 3 LC. The fibrils were extracted from the explanted heart of a patient (FOR005) and consist of 115-residue fibril proteins, mainly from the LC variable domain. The fibril structures imply that a 180 degrees rotation around the disulfide bond and a major unfolding step are necessary for fibrils to form. The two fibril structures show highly similar fibril protein folds, differing in only a 12-residue segment. Remarkably, the two structures do not represent separate fibril morphologies, as they can co-exist at different z-axial positions within the same fibril. Our data imply the presence of structural breaks at the interface of the two structural forms. Systemic AL amyloidosis is a protein misfolding disease caused by the aggregation and fibrillation of immunoglobulin light chains (LCs). Here, the authors present the cryo-EM structures of lambda 3 LC-derived amyloid fibrils that were isolated from patient tissue and they observe structural breaks, where the two different fibril structures co-exist at different z-axial positions within the same fibril.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据