4.5 Article

Standardized salvage completion pancreatectomy for grade C postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy (with video)

期刊

HPB
卷 23, 期 9, 页码 1418-1426

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.02.005

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Emergency completion pancreatectomy after pancreatoduodenectomy is a technically demanding procedure. The four-step standardized technique used in this study appears to be relatively safe and reproducible, especially for young surgeons. Intraoperative blood loss and operative duration were relatively low, with some patients experiencing mortality during the perioperative period.
Background: Emergency completion pancreatectomy (CP) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a technically demanding procedure. We report our experiences with a four-step standardized technique used at our center since 2012. Methods: In the first step, the gastrojejunostomy is divided with a stapler to quickly access the pancreatic anastomosis and permit adequate exposure, especially in cases of active bleeding. Second, the bowel loops connected to the pancreatic anastomosis is divided in cases of pancreaticojejunostomy. Third, the pancreatectomy is completed with or without the splenic vessels and spleen conservation according to the local conditions. Finally, the fourth step reconstructs in a Roux-en-Y fashion and ensures drainage. Results: From January 2012 to December 2019, 450 patients underwent PD at our center. Reintervention for grade C postoperative pancreatic fistula was decided for 30 patients, and CP was performed in 21 patients. The mean intraoperative blood loss and operative duration were relatively low (600 ml and 240 min, respectively). During the perioperative period, three patients died from multiple organ failure, and two patients died intraoperatively from a cataclysmic hemorrhage originating from the superior mesenteric artery. Discussion: Our standardized procedure appears to be relatively safe, reproducible, and could be particularly useful for young surgeons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据