4.7 Article

Neoagarotetraose extends the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans through AMPK mediated signaling pathways and activation of autophagy

期刊

JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL FOODS
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2020.104341

关键词

Neoagarotetraose; Caenorhabditis elegans; Longevity; AMPK; DAF-16; Dietary restriction

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0400204, 2016YFD0400800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31701549]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NAT has been shown to extend the lifespan of C. elegans and improve resistance to heat and oxidation stress. The mechanism involves insulin/insulin-like signaling and activation of AMPK, leading to enhanced activity of DAF-16 and induction of autophagy. These findings suggest that NAT could be used as a dietary restriction mimic centered on AMPK and has potential anti-aging effects in higher organisms.
Neoagarotetraose (NAT) has been reported to ameliorate aging-associated diseases. The present study found that NAT extended the lifespan of Caenorhabditis (C.) elegans up to 21.9% and improved resistance to stresses of heat and oxidation. Moreover, using a series of C. elegans mutants, insulin/insulin-like signaling (IIS) was found to be involved in NAT mediated lifespan extension. Meanwhile, the extended lifespan by NAT was in part via AMP activated protein kinase (AMPK), which further enhanced the activity of DAF-16. NAT could lower ATP levels and act as a mimic of dietary restriction (DR) as evidenced by the involvement of nutrient sensing pathways, such as IIS, AMPK, and target of rapamycin (TOR). Moreover, NAT induced autophagy both in worms and in human embryonic lung fibroblast cells. Taken together, NAT could be potentially used as a DR mimic centered on AMPK. The results from this study provide new evidence for anti-aging effect of NAT in C. elegnas and insights into implication of anti-aging activity of NAT in higher organisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据