4.6 Article

Non-Metabolic Functions of PKM2 Contribute to Cervical Cancer Cell Proliferation Induced by the HPV16 E7 Oncoprotein

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v13030433

关键词

HPV16 E7; cervical cancer; PKM2; ML265; non-pyruvate kinase function

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 CA188646]
  2. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas [RP180275]
  3. Golfers Against Cancer research grant
  4. University of Houston
  5. [CA188646]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HPV16 E7 increases PKM2 expression in cervical cancer cells and activates a non-glycolytic function of PKM2 to promote cell proliferation. High PKM2 expression is associated with worse prognosis in HPV+ cervical cancers. Targeting PKM2 may be a potential therapeutic strategy for HPV-associated cervical cancer.
Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) mainly catalyzes glycolysis, but it also exerts non-glycolytic functions in several cancers. While it has been shown to interact with the human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) E7 oncoprotein, the functional significance of PKM2 in HPV-associated cervical cancer has been elusive. Here, we show that HPV16 E7 increased the expression of PKM2 in cervical cancer cells. TCGA data analyses revealed a higher level of PKM2 in HPV+ than HPV- cervical cancers and a worse prognosis for patients with high PKM2 expression. Functionally, we demonstrate that shRNA-mediated PKM2 knockdown decreased the proliferation of HPV+ SiHa cervical cancer cells. PKM2 knockdown also inhibited the E7-induced proliferation of cervical cancer cells. ML265 activating the pyruvate kinase function of PKM2 inhibited cell cycle progression and colony formation. ML265 treatments decreased phosphorylation of PKM2 at the Y105 position that has been associated with non-glycolytic functions. On the contrary, HPV16 E7 increased the PKM2 phosphorylation. Our results indicate that E7 increases PKM2 expression and activates a non-glycolytic function of PKM2 to promote cervical cancer cell proliferation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据