4.6 Review

HIV-1 Infection Transcriptomics: Meta-Analysis of CD4+T Cells Gene Expression Profiles

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v13020244

关键词

infection; latency; transcriptomics; genomics; gene ontology; pathway analysis

类别

资金

  1. ISE-EMH (Italian-Slovenian Ecosystem for Electronic and Mobile Health) from European Community [07/2019]
  2. BioHub-A High-throughput Platform for OMICs Data Analysis and Integration from the Italian Ministry of Health [RC03/20]
  3. Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq) [APQ 405825-2018-8]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a meta-analysis of RNA-Seq expression profiles in samples of HIV-1 infected CD4+ T cells, identifying 208 differentially expressed genes related to immune response, cell adhesion, cell migration, inflammation, apoptosis, and signaling pathways.
HIV-1 infection elicits a complex dynamic of the expression various host genes. High throughput sequencing added an expressive amount of information regarding HIV-1 infections and pathogenesis. RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) is currently the tool of choice to investigate gene expression in a several range of experimental setting. This study aims at performing a meta-analysis of RNA-Seq expression profiles in samples of HIV-1 infected CD4+ T cells compared to uninfected cells to assess consistently differentially expressed genes in the context of HIV-1 infection. We selected two studies (22 samples: 15 experimentally infected and 7 mock-infected). We found 208 differentially expressed genes in infected cells when compared to uninfected/mock-infected cells. This result had moderate overlap when compared to previous studies of HIV-1 infection transcriptomics, but we identified 64 genes already known to interact with HIV-1 according to the HIV-1 Human Interaction Database. A gene ontology (GO) analysis revealed enrichment of several pathways involved in immune response, cell adhesion, cell migration, inflammation, apoptosis, Wnt, Notch and ERK/MAPK signaling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据