4.4 Article

Detection and Analysis of TCP-SYN DDoS Attack in Software-Defined Networking

期刊

WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS
卷 118, 期 4, 页码 2295-2317

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-021-08127-6

关键词

SDN; DDoS; IDS; Machine learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Software-defined networking (SDN) is an advanced technology that provides flexibility and cost-efficiency based on business requirements. This study focuses on the impact of spoofed and non-spoofed TCP-SYN flooding attacks on controller resources in SDN architecture, and proposes a machine learning based intrusion detection system.
Software-defined networking (SDN) is an advanced networking technology that yields flexibility with cost-efficiency as per the business requirements. SDN breaks the vertical integration of control and data plane and promotes centralized network management. SDN allows data intensive applications to work more efficiently by making the network dynamically configurable. With the growing development of SDN technology, the issue of security becomes critical because of its architectural characteristics. Currently, Distributed denial of service (DDoS) is one of the most powerful attacks that cause the services to be unavailable for normal users. DDoS seeks to consume the resources of the SDN controller with the intention to slow down working of the network. In this paper, a detailed analysis of the effect of spoofed and non-spoofed TCP-SYN flooding attacks on the controller resources in SDN is presented. We also suggest a machine learning based intrusion detection system. Five different classification models belong to a variety of families are used to classify the traffic, and evaluated using different performance indicators. Cross-validation technique is used to validate the classification models. This work enables better features to be extracted and classify the traffic efficiently. The experimental results reveal significantly good performance with all the considered classification models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据