4.7 Article

A numerical approach for the determination of graphite deformation behaviour by using microtribological pressure tests

期刊

WEAR
卷 476, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2021.203652

关键词

Surface analysis; Finite element modelling; Solid lubricants; Microtribometer; Graphite; Bearings

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [AL533/37-1, DI1494/7-1, SPP 2074]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on the use of graphite coating in high temperature environments to increase the lifetime of rolling bearings. Numerical simulations and experiments were conducted to analyze the deformation behavior of the graphite coating under pressure tests, providing a yield stress for further usage.
Most tribological systems use oil or grease to keep up the desired operation conditions, whereas unlubricated systems are relatively rare. Beside these three possibilities, tribological systems can also be lubricated by solid materials such as graphite. Especially in high temperatures environments, graphite has high potential to increase the lifetime of rolling bearings. For such applications, new coating and lubrication concepts for roller bearings are engineered. This process requires a detailed understanding of the system behaviour on micro and macro scale. This contribution investigates the influence of the surface topography and the material behaviour of graphite as coating in pressure tests. Numerical simulations in combination with microtribometer experiments allow to analyse the deformation behaviour of the graphite coating. A numerical parameter study is conducted to remodel microtribometer pressure experiments. The results of the experiments show that a graphite coating of thickness 3.6 mu m compresses about 30% under a load of 402 mN in microtribometer experiments. The combination of experiments and simulations allows to determine a yield stress for a perfect elastic-plastic material model for further usage in finite element simulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据