4.7 Article

Construction waste modelling for residential construction projects in New Zealand to enhance design outcomes

期刊

WASTE MANAGEMENT
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 484-493

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.10.010

关键词

Construction waste; Waste minimisation; Residential construction; Waste quantification; Waste ratio

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Construction waste generation is a significant issue globally, with New Zealand's construction industry responsible for a large portion of landfill waste. This study analyzed waste quantities from residential buildings to quantify waste generation rate and identified the impact of design decisions on waste generation, which can be applicable to timber-framed homes overseas.
Construction waste generation is a crucial issue in the construction industry worldwide which gives significant negative impact towards the environment, economy and society. New Zealand (NZ) is no exception with the construction industry being responsible for up to 50% of landfill waste. The quantification of construction waste generation is critically important to manage its negative impacts effectively. Due to the differences in materials, technologies and processes in the construction projects, NZ requires more specific data to quantify waste generation accurately. This study analysed waste quantities from 159 detached residential buildings to quantify waste generation rate per gross floor area (WGR). The WGR is 32. 2 kg/m(2) which sits mid-range compared to other international studies. A regression model for predicting waste and trend analysis were conducted to identify the highly correlated design features with waste generation. Findings of this study are useful to determine the impact of design decisions on waste generation for typical NZ builds. Although the findings primarily aimed at the NZ construction industry, the results can apply to detached timber-framed homes overseas. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据