4.7 Article

Transverse-to-transverse diffuse ultrasonic double scattering

期刊

ULTRASONICS
卷 111, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.106301

关键词

Transverse-to-transverse (T-T) double scattering; Strongly scattering material; Quasi-Monte Carlo; GPU acceleration

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB1201302-13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new transverse-to-transverse double scattering model (T-T DSR) is proposed in this work to more accurately model transverse ultrasonic backscatter, utilizing a quasi-Monte Carlo method and GPU acceleration for numerical computations. Experimental results demonstrate that the T-T DSR model outperforms the T-T SSR model in evaluating grain size of strongly scattering specimens.
Previously, a transverse-to-transverse single scattering model (T-T SSR) was developed for a pulse echo configuration, which may have limitations for strongly scattering materials. In this work, a transverse-to transverse double scattering model (T-T DSR) is presented to model the transverse ultrasonic backscatter more accurately. First, the Wigner distribution of the transducer beam pattern is extended to a transverse wave. Next, the multiple scattering framework is followed to derive the transverse and longitudinal components of the second-order scattering. Then, a quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) method is used with Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) acceleration to calculate numerical results of the final expression which contains a five-dimensional integral. The correlation length, the focal length of the transducer, and incident angle are used to investigate differences between the T-T DSR model and the T-T SSR model. Finally, a backscatter experiment is performed on two stainless steel specimens with different grain sizes to determine the respective correlation lengths. The results show that the T-T DSR model has better performance over the T-T SSR model for evaluating the grain size of these relatively strongly-scattering specimens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据