4.7 Article

Three-dimensional seismic performance of mountain tunnel with imperfect interface considering P wave

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103720

关键词

Tunnel; Seismic deformation; Imperfect interface; Incidence angle; Earthquake force

资金

  1. Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics and Geohazards of Zhejiang Province [ZJRMG-2020-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A semi-analytic solution based on three-dimensional elastodynamic was developed to investigate the longitudinal deformation of deep-buried tunnels subjected to compression P wave. The study applied the wave function expansion method and complex function to express wave fields in different regions. An elastic spring model was introduced to satisfy the imperfect interface boundary between the tunnel lining and its surrounding rock mass. The numerical results showed that both the wave incidence angle and imperfect interface greatly influenced the magnitude and distribution of dynamic stress, impacting the seismic performance of the mountain tunnel.
A semi-analytic solution based on three-dimensional elastodynamic was developed to investigate the longitudinal deformation of deep-buried tunnels subjected to compression P wave. The wave function expansion method and the complex function were applied to express wave fields in different regions. An elastic spring model was introduced to satisfy the imperfect interface boundary between the tunnel lining and its surrounding rock mass. Influences of wave propagation direction and imperfect interface were discussed to illustrate the seismic performance of the mountain tunnel. Numerical results showed that both the wave incidence angle and imperfect interface influenced greatly the magnitude and distribution of dynamic stress. Besides, some fundamental deformation and failure modes were obtained from the numerical analysis considering the incidence angle. Based on the modes, the longitudinal deformation and damages of tunnel subjected to the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake were analyzed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据