4.4 Article

Lattice Boltzmann Modeling of the Apparent Viscosity of Thinning-Elastic Fluids in Porous Media

期刊

TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA
卷 137, 期 1, 页码 63-86

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11242-021-01544-y

关键词

Apparent viscosity; Shear-thinning; Viscoelastic thickening; Porous media; Lattice Boltzmann method

资金

  1. Chemical EOR Industrial Affiliates Project in the Center for Subsurface Energy and the Environment (CSEE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By using a lattice Boltzmann model, the flow of thinning-elastic fluids through porous media was simulated successfully, capturing both their viscoelastic and shear-thinning behaviors accurately. The model was verified against analytical solutions, and the thickening effect of the viscoelastic fluid was found to be more prominent in porous geometries with a large pore-throat ratio.
Many non-Newtonian fluids, including polymers, exhibit both shear-thinning and viscoelastic rheological properties. A lattice Boltzmann (LB) model is developed for simulation of the flow of thinning-elastic fluids through porous media. This model applies the Oldroyd-B constitutive equation and the Carreau model, respectively, to account for the viscoelastic and shear-thinning behaviors of the thinning-elastic fluid in porous media. Both rheological features are captured well by this model and are verified against analytical solutions. The thinning-then-thickening viscosity curve of the thinning-elastic fluid observed in experiments is reproduced by the present pore-scale simulations. In addition to the traditional extensional theory, we propose other important mechanisms for the increase in apparent viscosity of viscoelastic fluids at higher shear rates. The mechanisms proposed include the reduction in conductivity due to stagnant fluid, the compressed effective flow region, and larger energy dissipations caused by the viscoelastic instability. We find that the viscoelastic thickening effect is more prominent in porous geometries with a large pore-throat ratio.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据