4.6 Article

Isolation, genotyping and virulence determination of a Toxoplasma gondii strain from non-human primate from China

期刊

TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES
卷 69, 期 2, 页码 919-925

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1111/tbed.14047

关键词

genotype; isolation; non‐ human primates; rhesus monkey; sero‐ epidemiology; T; gondii; virulence

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province, China [202300410214]
  2. Key research projects of Henan higher education institutions [21A230009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified a case of Toxoplasma gondii infection in a rhesus monkey collected from zoos in Henan Province, China. A new strain of T. gondii, designated as TgMonkeyCHn1, was successfully isolated from the monkey's myocardium, with unique characteristics in genotype and virulence genes. This is the first T. gondii strain isolated from Old World monkeys, demonstrating a new host record for T. gondii.
Toxoplasma gondii infects almost all warm-blooded animals, including humans and non-human primates. Many cases of T. gondii infection in non-human primates have been reported worldwide. In this study, 15 monkeys were collected from zoos in Henan Province between 2016 and 2019. A modified agglutination test (MAT) (cut-off: 1:8) showed that 46.7% (7/15) of the heart juices had T. gondii IgG antibody transformation. One viable T. gondii strain was successfully isolated from the myocardium of a rhesus monkey by bioassay in mice. This strain was designated as TgMonkeyCHn1. The DNA of T. gondii tachyzoites was obtained using cell cultures, and the genotype of this strain was determined by PCR-RFLP with 10 markers and the virulence genes ROP5 and ROP18. The genotype and ROP18/ROP5 (3/6) of TgMonkeyCHn1 did not match any known genotypes. In addition, the TgMonkeyCHn1 formed low number of tissue cysts and was non-lethal to mice. To our knowledge, this is the first T. gondii strain isolated from Old World monkeys. Rhesus monkey is a new host record for T. gondii.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据