4.7 Review

Advanced nanomaterials as sample technique for bio-analysis

期刊

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 135, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2020.116168

关键词

Proteomics; Metabonomics; CTCs; Nanomaterials; Nucleic acid; Extracellular vesicles; Separation

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0507501]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22074019, 22004017, 21425518]
  3. Shanghai Sailing Program [20YF1405300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biological compositions such as cells, proteins, nucleic acids are closely related to physiological and pathological events, serving as therapeutic targets and disease indicators. Nanomaterials with flexibility in preparation and manipulation are key to solving analysis challenges. This review elaborates on recent advancements and development trends of nanomaterials in bio-analysis.
The biological compositions including cells, proteins/peptides, nucleic acids, extracellular vesicles (EVs) and metabolites are no doubt closely related to almost all physiological and pathological events in organism. Parts of them with specific characteristics can serve as therapeutic target or even disease indicator at early stage. However, all of them especially the specific portion associated with diseases are surrounded by complex environment where there are a large number of high-abundance proteins and salts and the like, leading to difficulties in direct analysis for them. Much efforts have been made to solve this problem, among which nanomaterials with outstanding flexibility in preparation and manipulation are attracting great attention. In this review, we provide a relatively comprehensive elaboration on recent advancement of nanomaterials as sample technique for bio-analysis, focusing on their preparation and application in all the above-mentioned biological compositions. Furthermore, the limits and development tendency of nanomaterials in this field are proposed. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据