4.5 Article

An in vitro alveolar epithelial cell model recapitulates LRRK2 inhibitor-induced increases in lamellar body size observed in preclinical models

期刊

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
卷 70, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2020.105012

关键词

LRRK2; Lung; Surfactant; Alveolar epithelial cell; Transwell

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study established an in vitro AEC model that replicated abnormal lung findings observed in animals with LRRK2 perturbations, demonstrating that LRRK2 inhibition can significantly increase LB size. This research has the potential to expand current understanding of LRRK2 function in the lung.
Alveolar type II (ATII) epithelial cells contain lamellar bodies (LBs) which synthesize and store lung surfactants. In animals, the inhibition or knockout of leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) causes abnormal enlargement of LBs in ATII cells. This effect of LRRK2 inhibition in lung is largely accepted as being mediated directly through blocking of the kinase function; however, downstream consequences in the lung remain unknown. In this work we established an in vitro alveolar epithelial cell (AEC) model that recapitulates the in vivo phenotype of ATII cells and developed an assay to quantify changes in LB size in response to LRRK2 inhibitors. Culture of primary human AECs at the air-liquid interface on matrigel and collagen-coated transwell inserts in the presence of growth factors promoted the LB formation and apical microvilli and induced expression of LRRK2 and ATII cell markers. Treatment with a selective LRRK2 inhibitor resulted in pharmacological reduction of phospho-LRRK2 and a significant increase in LB size; effects previously reported in lungs of non-human primates treated with LRRK2 inhibitor. In summary, our human in vitro AEC model recapitulates the abnormal lung findings observed in LRRK2-perturbed animals and holds the potential for expanding current understanding of LRRK2 function in the lung.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据