4.6 Review

Severe respiratory syncytial virus disease in preterm infants: a case of innate immaturity

期刊

THORAX
卷 76, 期 9, 页码 942-950

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-216291

关键词

respiratory infection; innate immunity

资金

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
  2. CSL Centenary Fellowship
  3. Australian Postgraduate Award Scholarship
  4. Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RSV is the most common viral pathogen causing acute lower respiratory tract infection in young children. Premature birth is a common risk factor for severe RSV disease due to an immature innate immune system, leading to increased susceptibility to RSV. Understanding differences in innate immunity between preterm and term infants is crucial for developing interventions to reduce disease burden in this vulnerable population.
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common viral pathogen associated with acute lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in children under 5 years of age. Severe RSV disease is associated with the development of chronic respiratory complications such as recurrent wheezing and asthma. A common risk factor for developing severe RSV disease is premature gestation and this is largely due to an immature innate immune system. This increases susceptibility to RSV since the innate immune system is less able to protect against pathogens at a time when adaptive immunity has not fully developed. This review focuses on comparing different aspects of innate immunity between preterm and term infants to better understand why preterm infants are more susceptible to severe RSV disease. Identifying early life innate immune biomarkers associated with the development of severe RSV disease, and understanding how these compare between preterm and term infants, remains a critically important question that would aid the development of interventions to reduce the burden of disease in this vulnerable population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据