4.7 Article

Burst pressure of thin-walled pipes with dent and gouge defects

期刊

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
卷 159, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.107213

关键词

Thin-walled pipes; Dent; Gouge; Experimental study; Finite element analysis

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project of China [2016ZX05052-005]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51874324]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the failure pressure and strain history of thin-walled pipes with dent and gouge defects through experimental and numerical studies. The results indicate that gouge size has the strongest effect on the failure pressure, and pipe deformation is more pronounced for small defects.
Mechanical interference is the main cause of the failure of thin-walled pipelines in some countries. Gouges and dents are two common types of external interference that threaten the structural integrity of thin-walled pipes. This paper presents an experimental and numerical investigation of the failure pressure and strain history of thin-walled pipes with dent and gouge defects. First, four full-scale burst tests were conducted. Then, a 3D nonlinear finite element model was established, and its accuracy and reliability were validated using the experimental data. On the basis of the experimental and numerical results, the failure pressure of the thin-walled pipes with dent and gouge defects was studied in detail. During the burst process, the variation in axial strain is small, whereas the circumferential strain changes significantly. Test results show that failure location occurred at the flank of dent. Pipe deformation is more prominent for small defects. A parametric study suggests that the failure pressure increases with decreasing dent depth, pipe diameter-to-wall-thickness ratio, and gouge depth and length. The gouge size has the strongest effect on the failure pressure of thin-walled pipes with dent and gouge defects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据