4.5 Article

Isoconversional computations for nonisothermal kinetic predictions

期刊

THERMOCHIMICA ACTA
卷 697, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2020.178859

关键词

Isoconversional analysis; Computational tools; Simulated data; Nonisothermal predictions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Isoconversional analysis is a model-free and powerful approach that provides quantitative information of the kinetics, with main outputs of activation energy and preexponential factor. It allows for accurate predictions of nonisothermal kinetics profiles, showing excellent agreements with simulated curves, even for multistep kinetic programs. The dependence of heating rates on the shift of nonisothermal kinetics profiles is briefly discussed by the authors.
Isoconversional analysis is a model-free and powerful approach that readily provide quantitative information of the kinetics of a thermally activated transformation. Activation energy and preexponential factor are the main output of isoconversional analysis. Another practical application is the kinetic predictions that are computed in a model-free way. In this communication, a computational tool of predicting nonisothermal kinetics is presented. This approach is directly derived from an advanced isoconversional analysis. It assumes that a nonisothermal program can be decomposed in a series of infinitesimal isothermal steps. For the development of computations, four kinetic models are simulated and are used as input data. Predicted nonisothermal kinetic profiles are compared to simulated curves and show excellent agreements. Accuracy, effect of sampling and noise are assessed. This approach gives excellent predictions for the four models (among them one comprises variable activation energy). The predictions are also accurate when dealing with a multistep kinetic program (alternating isothermal and nonisothermal stages). Furthermore, the authors briefly discuss the dependance of the heating rates on the shift of nonisothermal kinetics profiles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据