4.5 Article

Curing behavior studies of phenol-containing phthalonitrile monomer for advanced composite materials

期刊

THERMOCHIMICA ACTA
卷 696, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2020.178837

关键词

Phthalonitrile; Kinetic; Curing behaviors; Isoconversional method

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11972008]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [A2018005]
  3. Science Foundation of the National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Composites in Special Environments

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the curing behavior of phenol-containing phthalonitrile monomer and found that it has a strong reactivity with significantly lower activation energy compared to phenol-catalyzed reactions. By verifying the accuracy of the curing kinetic equation and predicting the curing time, it provided important insights for the application of phenol-containing phthalonitrile polymer.
Phenol-containing phthalonitrile polymer is a novel type of autocatalytic phthalonitrile thermoset with outstanding thermal performance. In this work, the curing behavior of phenol-containing phthalonitrile monomer was studied by differential scanning calorimetry. Based on the isoconversional principle, the activation energy was calculated as 63 +/- 6 kJ/mol. It is significantly lower than the reported that of phenol catalyzed, indicating a strong reactivity of phenol-containing phthalonitrile monomer. Additionally, the reaction model was judged to be autocatalytic and the remaining kinetic parameters were calculated by linear regression method. By comparing the experimental data with the kinetic mathematic model, the accuracy of the curing kinetic equation was verified. Moreover, the curing kinetic equation was adopted to predict the curing time for phenol-containing phthalonitrile polymer to fully solidify under a constant temperature, which is of great significance for the application of phenol-containing phthalonitrile polymer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据