4.5 Article

Bayesian positive system identification: Truncated Gaussian prior and hyperparameter estimation

期刊

SYSTEMS & CONTROL LETTERS
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2020.104857

关键词

System identification; Bayesian method; Positive systems; Expectation-maximization algorithm

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council [201808050115]
  2. JSPS, Japan KAKENHI [20K04534]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20K04534] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a new method for Bayesian identification of positive finite impulse response (FIR) models by using a truncated Gaussian prior. The parameterization in the truncated Gaussian prior can better reflect the characteristics of the impulse response of the system to be identified. Compared to the traditional Gaussian prior, the truncated Gaussian prior outperforms in positive FIR system identification.
Bayesian methods have been extended for the linear system identification problem in the past ten years. The traditional Bayesian identification selects a Gaussian prior and considers the tuning of kernels, i.e., the covariance matrix of a Gaussian prior. However, Gaussian priors cannot express the system information appropriately for identifying a positive finite impulse response (FIR) model. This paper exploits the truncated Gaussian prior and develops Bayesian identification procedures for positive FIR models. The proposed parameterizations in the truncated Gaussian prior can reflect the decay rate and the correlation of the impulse response of the system to be identified. The expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm is tailored to the hyperparameter estimation problem of positive system identification with the truncated Gaussian prior. Numerical experiments compare the truncated Gaussian prior to the traditional Gaussian prior for positive FIR system identification. The simulation results demonstrate that the truncated Gaussian prior outperforms the Gaussian prior. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据