期刊
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 1064-1079出版社
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08373-6
关键词
Laparoscopy; Robotic surgery; Education; Cholecystectomy-randomized controlled trial
类别
资金
- Projekt DEAL
In the initial learning phase for novices, robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC) showed better surgical performance and fewer complications compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), with no significant difference in operating times. Students perceived RAC as less physically demanding and frustrating than LC, indicating potential advantages for robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) over conventional laparoscopy (CL) in surgical novices.
Background Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) potentially reduces workload and shortens the surgical learning curve compared to conventional laparoscopy (CL). The present study aimed to compare robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC) to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the initial learning phase for novices. Methods In a randomized crossover study, medical students (n = 40) in their clinical years performed both LC and RAC on a cadaveric porcine model. After standardized instructions and basic skill training, group 1 started with RAC and then performed LC, while group 2 started with LC and then performed RAC. The primary endpoint was surgical performance measured with Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) score, secondary endpoints included operating time, complications (liver damage, gallbladder perforations, vessel damage), force applied to tissue, and subjective workload assessment. Results Surgical performance was better for RAC than for LC for total OSATS (RAC = 77.4 +/- 7.9 vs. LC = 73.8 +/- 9.4; p = 0.025, global OSATS (RAC = 27.2 +/- 1.0 vs. LC = 26.5 +/- 1.6; p = 0.012, and task specific OSATS score (RAC = 50.5 +/- 7.5 vs. LC = 47.1 +/- 8.5; p = 0.037). There were less complications with RAC than with LC (10 (25.6%) vs. 26 (65.0%), p = 0.006) but no difference in operating times (RAC = 77.0 +/- 15.3 vs. LC = 75.5 +/- 15.3 min; p = 0.517). Force applied to tissue was similar. Students found RAC less physical demanding and less frustrating than LC. Conclusions Novices performed their first cholecystectomies with better performance and less complications with RAS than with CL, while operating time showed no differences. Students perceived less subjective workload for RAS than for CL. Unlike our expectations, the lack of haptic feedback on the robotic system did not lead to higher force application during RAC than LC and did not increase tissue damage. These results show potential advantages for RAS over CL for surgical novices while performing their first RAC and LC using an ex vivo cadaveric porcine model. [GRAPHICS] .
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据